Hello Greg,

In fact, I try to manage the situation where we have ZAPI in one hand and OSPF-API in other hand. ZAPI & OSPF_API work well for the moment. But, my concern is to extend/generalize
OSPF_API to other Quagga daemon (IS-IS and BGP to support BGP-LS at least).

So the question is two fold:
- There is an architecture decision to take: do we continue to maintain / extend two communication channels i.e. ZAPI and OSPF_API or is it time to think to Quagga architecture and design a flexible channel (single or multiple) communication system for all purpose
 - And an implementation choice for this communication system.

I understand that the ZAPI bus could be congested when playing with a large number of VPN. So, Vincent Jardin suggest me to not extend ZAPI and look to an other communication channel.But, is it valuable to maintain 2 different API, or is it time to move to a common system sufficiently
powerfull and safe to handle present and future needed.

I'm open to any advice and suggestion, but would not start a development that conduct in a dead end.

I'm also another question regarding the thread implementation / usage in Quagga. Looking to the architecture, we could keep the modularity of Quagga, but moving to pthread and dynamic load of daemon. We could have a main pthread (i.e. Zebra layer) that dynamically load piece of code that implement a given protocol regarding the configuration file or based on which protocol is needed. This allow the possibility to share the same memory space between the different daemon (pthread) while avoiding communication channel between process. But, perhaps I'm completely wrong, and I
perfectly understand that it is a huge amount of work to do.

Regards,

Olivier

Le 03/03/2015 16:19, Greg Troxel a écrit :
My basic opinion is that shm interfaces end up being painful for various
reasons, including portability but also leaving shm segments around.
Since this is control plane, and sockets are fast anyway, I don't see
any reason to get wrapped up in shm.



_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to