On Wed, 6 May 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
highly disputed, and sorely contentious implementation.
Just to re-iterate again, everyone, including Juliusz, seems to be agreed that Quagga is fully honouring all the licence conditions. At least the written licence conditions accompanying the source code.
Though I wonder now, at what point do Juliusz' other demands effectively also become (GPL incompatible potentially) additional licence conditions? (Obviously past such a point, if it exists, we must _not_ distribute babeld).
regards, -- Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: Greener's Law: Never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel. _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
