On Fri, 8 May 2015, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
I am going to butt out of this until I get a legal opinion on commit:
5734509c0545ebd95a5b8e3f22a911c1a39ffa1b
This will take a few days.
In the interim, I am satisfied that I understand the terms under which
any future work I may perform in quagga will be under.
Glad to hear it helped clarify things for you. I'd be interested in the
outcome of the above, so far as you can share.
For the convenience of others, the commit Dave is talking about is:
http:
//git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/commit/?id=5734509c0545ebd95a5b8e3f22a911c1a39ffa1b
And to re-iterate, we didn't realise this would upset Juliusz so greatly,
and we're willing to go to (fairly disruptive) lengths to re-write that
commit message as he wishes, if it is part of something that Juliusz could
fully support.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
"Let us condemn to hellfire all those who disagree with us."
-- militant religionists everywhere
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
