Is enabling the “bgp log-neighbor-changes” a good idea?

Or do we worry about some low end system where this change suddenly fills up
the disk/flash/ramdisk ? 

- Martin

On 21 Oct 2015, at 6:42, Daniel Walton wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by:   Donald Sharp <[email protected]>
> ---
> bgpd/bgpd.c |    5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bgpd/bgpd.c b/bgpd/bgpd.c
> index 400e2a3..1a10c2e 100644
> --- a/bgpd/bgpd.c
> +++ b/bgpd/bgpd.c
> @@ -1971,6 +1971,7 @@ bgp_create (as_t *as, const char *name)
>  bgp->default_keepalive = BGP_DEFAULT_KEEPALIVE;
>  bgp->restart_time = BGP_DEFAULT_RESTART_TIME;
>  bgp->stalepath_time = BGP_DEFAULT_STALEPATH_TIME;
> +  bgp_flag_set (bgp, BGP_FLAG_LOG_NEIGHBOR_CHANGES);
>
>  bgp->as = *as;
>
> @@ -5256,8 +5257,8 @@ bgp_config_write (struct vty *vty)
>                VTY_NEWLINE);
>
>      /* BGP log-neighbor-changes. */
> -      if (bgp_flag_check (bgp, BGP_FLAG_LOG_NEIGHBOR_CHANGES))
> -     vty_out (vty, " bgp log-neighbor-changes%s", VTY_NEWLINE);
> +      if (!bgp_flag_check (bgp, BGP_FLAG_LOG_NEIGHBOR_CHANGES))
> +     vty_out (vty, " no bgp log-neighbor-changes%s", VTY_NEWLINE);
>
>      /* BGP configuration. */
>      if (bgp_flag_check (bgp, BGP_FLAG_ALWAYS_COMPARE_MED))
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quagga-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to