On 10/13/2015 05:23 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
> Unless someone can come up with a case where setting the onlink flag,
> as done in this patch, causes any issues, I don't see a reason not to
> do it that way.

Given the amount of patches for this issue, there seems to be consensus
that this needs to be addressed in some way.

I have not seen any negative feedback or discussion to this proposed
patch, however it doesn't seem to show up in any of the current branches
at savannah.

Could one of the maintainers clarify what the status of this is?

-Christian



_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to