On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
There are some networking datamodels with different options (SDN) having their logic and building it (at opnfv). So, that's why we need to avoid to have something internal to zebra.
I'm not against an API, and I'm not against zebra being a client of that API. I would like Quagga to have its own namespace^WVRF management facility though, not least to be able to test it; and secondly to ease testing the rest of Quagga using namespaces.
regards, -- Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: In the long run we are all dead. -- John Maynard Keynes _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
