On 30/11/2015 16:25, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
There are some networking datamodels with different options (SDN)
having their logic and building it (at opnfv). So, that's why we need
to avoid to have something internal to zebra.
I'm not against an API, and I'm not against zebra being a client of that
API. I would like Quagga to have its own namespace^WVRF management
facility though, not least to be able to test it; and secondly to ease
testing the rest of Quagga using namespaces.
food for comments:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/MPLSVPNaaS
regards,
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
