On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Donald Sharp wrote:
I believe I understand your logic. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I don't have to necessarily :)
:)
The one thing that concerns me most is the semantics of 'rounds keeper'. If I go and talk to someone outside of the quagga community and explain what I do( or am attempting to do ) in the quagga community 'rounds keeper' has no meaning and just provokes more questions. I think I would prefer terms that are universally understood by people and as such 'rounds keeper' fails this test for me.
A rose by any other name. We can call it something else? "Gatekeeper" is what this was called at Sun. What else?
Why not call you, Vincent, and Greg the board of directors and people with commit access maintainers?
'Board' could work for me (that's obv what I had in mind, model wise), and over time we could figure out how to evolve that. Though, you'd have to ask Vincent and Greg their thoughts on that.
regards, -- Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: QOTD: "When she hauled ass, it took three trips." _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
