On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Lou Berger wrote: > > IMO non compliance with requirement behavior of an RFC should be viewed as >> a bug and fixed. >> > > I just don't agree.
How does this work then...is it your word no matter how the rest of the quagga community feels? That is certainly how it is coming across. Daniel
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
