On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Daniel Walton wrote: > > How does this work then...is it your word no matter how the rest of the >> quagga community feels? That is certainly how it is coming across. >> > > Someone disagreed with my patch, it isn't going in. How is that my word no > matter what? > > I'm allowed to argue why that patch should go in, surely? >
I'm not saying that you or anyone else should not argue for something they feel strongly about. My point was that the majority of the quagga community feels that the current behavior is a bug and that we should just fix it while you are in the opposite camp and havent' been willing to budge on this despite a month of discussion, clarification from the authors of the RFC on the intent of the RFC, etc. If you are not willing to say "ok I disagree with the quagga community but I am going to accept this patch anyway" then the reality is that it is your word no matter what. We've been going back and forth on this since mid March. In that time we (cumulus) have added 98 patches to our backlog of patches that we need to upstream...we aren't making progress we are getting further and further behind. Daniel
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
