On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:37:12AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > ahh - not necessarily -- particularly if it fixes a major interop issue > (which is the point of standards after all).
Well if you could fix the interop by changing a setting away from its current default, at least you have a workaround. And I would think the other value for the setting exists for a reason too. > So are you arguing this point theoretically, or do you believe there's a > real issue with *this* change. Said another way, do you really think > there are operators using an max link cost in normal/stable day to day > operations (and not just as a maintenance tool)? I don't recall what this change is, so no idea. I am just saying in general changing defaults in a program that doesn't keep default values in the config file is hazardous. link-detect is still not on by default (and while I certainly always want it on, I would not suggest changing the existing default behaviour.) -- Len Sorensen _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
