Lennart On 4/19/2016 10:17 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:39:48PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: >> Paul, >> >> You have a valid point on absolutes. One never should say never :-) >> >> That said, we're not talking some obscure feature here . Does any non-quagga >> based vendor, major or otherwise, support the non standard behavior as the >> default? If so , there may be some basis for this discussion. If not , and >> in my experience , then the current behavior should be viewed as a bug. >> >> Just one persons (my) opinion... > If upgrading from one version to another without changing anything in > the config causes a major change in behaviour, then that is a bug. ahh - not necessarily -- particularly if it fixes a major interop issue (which is the point of standards after all).
> Especially since the config tends to NOT save default values so you can't > even rely on having set something explicitly to make it keep doing that. > If you want what was the default but no longer is, you are screwed. > That is NOT good for the user. So are you arguing this point theoretically, or do you believe there's a real issue with *this* change. Said another way, do you really think there are operators using an max link cost in normal/stable day to day operations (and not just as a maintenance tool)? Thanks, Lou _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
