On Fri, 20 May 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
Can you clarify?
Is the “simple majority” the issue for these “some issues” and it
could be solved for these issues with a super majority (i.e. 67%) or
do you need/want unanimous agreement on these? If you think it needs a
“unanimous agreement”, then could you come up with an example of an
issue where you see the need for?
I think in the vast majority of cases, with an open mind and a bit of
patience, we can work out mutually acceptable solutions to problems.
In the other cases, it seems it's better to agree to disagree, leave
upstream at the intersection of what is acceptable, and let stuff be
carried outside.
I'm loathe to go anywhere near examples... ;)
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
A possum must be himself, and being himself he is honest.
-- Walt Kelly_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
