Paul, Great to see this published. Is there a quagga convention WRT C99?
I see the following when compiling proposed/8 if.c:1151: error: ?for? loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode if.c:1151: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code zclient.c:903: error: ?for? loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode zclient.c:903: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code interface.c:2505: error: ?for? loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode interface.c:2505: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code Lou On 6/14/2016 9:02 AM, Paul Jakma wrote: > Hi, > > Took a bit longer, but the proposed patches are up in: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/log/?h=volatile/patch-tracking/8/proposed/patchwork > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/log/?h=volatile/patch-tracking/8/proposed/donald-take-3 > > I've done some initial prioritising, so the 'restricted node' patch, > 'sockaddr_dl' and table cmd are at the end, as there were already some > comments on those. > > Note: I've had a good few conflicts on 'install_element' lines, due to > various patches adding/removing commands with the restricted node and > 'auto-install view commands into enable' patches. I didn't look too > closely as to whether I resolved them correctly. > > Still to do is linearise these 2 heads together. > > regards, _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
