On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote:
- e.g. like trying to push binding majority votes through, in order to try get around comments on a series of their patches].
Just to re-iterate, I just don't see how that is a reasonable approach. Reasonable ways might have been to first start a discussion on list about the take-3 backlog and stating the opinion that it should go in essentially as is on list. I still think the most reasonable way is just to address the comments individually of course.
Sitting on round-7, and this whole discussion, seems less reasonable. regards, -- Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A Fortune: The first version always gets thrown away. _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
