On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote:
https: //lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2012-October/009932.html and
https: //lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2012-November/010020.html.
I didn't notice that
Ah seems I did, but didn't press it further (would have been busy
elsewhere).
Still, given other events in around or after that time, I think it'd be
better now to clarify this. If you want the licence on that file to be
permissive, and it's fairly standalone, then just license it under a
permissive licence?
Conventional as possible wrt licensing ftw.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
Ten years of rejection slips is nature's way of telling you to stop writing.
-- R. Geis
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
