On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote: > > https: //lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2012-October/009932.html >>> and >>> https: //lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2012-November/010020.html >>> . >>> >> >> I didn't notice that >> > > Ah seems I did, but didn't press it further (would have been busy > elsewhere). > > Still, given other events in around or after that time, I think it'd be > better now to clarify this. If you want the licence on that file to be > permissive, and it's fairly standalone, then just license it under a > permissive licence? >
Sure, having only an ISC license works just fine for me. Conventional as possible wrt licensing ftw. Makes sense... Thanks, Avneesh > > > regards, > -- > Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A > Fortune: > Ten years of rejection slips is nature's way of telling you to stop > writing. > -- R. Geis >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
