On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Martin Winter wrote:

Didn’t we had this discussion back in february and agreed not to do rebasing?

Where?

It really makes testing painful.

If there are serious reason for a rebase, then I would rather see a 8a branch (and the old 8 branch abandoned) I would prefer to just have fixes/reverse commits added on top of it.

Well, that's why it has 'volatile' in the namespace. Rather than create a myriad of string refs, instead it'd be easier to just do something like:

        If $REF contains "volatile"
                set REF to the commit ID instead.

The commit ID will be stable.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
"Those who do not do politics will be done in by politics."
                -- French Proverb
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to