On 1 Jul 2016, at 8:03, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
Didn’t we had this discussion back in february and agreed not to do
rebasing?
Where?
http://ipv6.gossamer-threads.com/lists/quagga/dev/30142?search_string=FreeBSD%20Testing%20Update;#30142
Unless you claim that this only applied to the proposed/6 branch. I took
this as an agreement for
general work on proposed branches.
It really makes testing painful.
If there are serious reason for a rebase, then I would rather see a
8a branch (and the old 8 branch abandoned) I would prefer to just
have fixes/reverse commits added on top of it.
Well, that's why it has 'volatile' in the namespace. Rather than
create a myriad of string refs, instead it'd be easier to just do
something like:
If $REF contains "volatile"
set REF to the commit ID instead.
The commit ID will be stable.
But this doesn’t solve the issue on tracking where things broke. I
would need to tag the test runs with
every commit ID included in the code. Not really a solution…
- Martin
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
