Le 5 juil. 2016 05:50, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > So in thinking about this a bit, perhaps there's something useful that > we can try in parallel with the single-person focused effort of > proposed/8 (or 9) -- what about trying out the new process in a test > repo on github?
No, it will add mess on the mess. > > We could follow the proposed rolling integration process based on > patches ack'ed/discussed on quagga-dev, using a new/non-conflicting > branch (e.g., 'dev/master'), and all those who have contributed to the > process as the initial maintainer set (listed below + whoever else - > I'm sure Martin/Donald are on the list.) > > Anyone interested in trying it out? > > Lou > > PS I suspect my timing might be bad given this is a high vacation > week/period. So may need to give a little bit for folks to respond... > > On 6/29/2016 6:21 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > > All, > > > > There are many messages to update Quagga's organization. It is a good > > way to proceed and we'll have to do something. > > > > However, from facts, we all see that > > http://patchwork.quagga.net/ > > needed to be drained. Some patches were 4y+ old. > > > > So, I strongly believe that for the benefits of everyone, > > 1st: patchwork needs to be drained, > > http://patchwork.quagga.net/bundle/paul/round-8/ > > > > 2nd: we need all the ff to be applied onto the head: > > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/log/?h=volatile/patch-tracking/8/proposed/ff > > > > Currently, it is being done by Paul. So Thank you! > > > > 3rd: finish the drain of patchwork (round 9?). Maybe it could be > > started in parallel while Paul is finishing the round 8. To do it in > > parallel, it would/could be expedite if patchwork could get some ack't, > > for instance, > > http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1652/ > > no one did ack't it. It is important to get a review or an ack. > > > > 4th: then, let's update Quagga's organization for the benefits of > > everyone. Many comments from Lou/Martin/Jafar/Paul/Donald/Olivier/etc. > > are very valid. > > > > So, instead of getting many emails about new Quagga's organization, I > > would rather prefer to see emails that review patches. Then, once > > patches will be merged into the head, let's fix the organization. > > > > Let's be focus all together, > > Vincent > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Quagga-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
