Hi, This is my first patch to Quagga, so I'm not quite familiar with the process. What's the next action to help this get reviewed? Should I resubmit the patch so it gets tested again?
- Thorvald On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Martin Winter < mwin...@opensourcerouting.org> wrote: > Hmm… my updated CI tests with a setup verification seems to fail including > any errors of it. > > The issue here is that RIPng failed to bring up any neighbors (may have > crashed > at startup), so no RIPng test were executed. > > - Martin > > > On 29 Sep 2016, at 12:00, cisys...@netdef.org wrote: > > Continous Integration Result: FAILED >> >> See below for issues. >> This is an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system. >> For questions and feedback, feel free to email >> Martin Winter <mwin...@opensourcerouting.org>. >> >> Patches applied : >> Patchwork 2074: http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/2074 >> [quagga-dev,16135] Extend BGP_SEND_ASPATH_CHECK to cover >> confederations >> Tested on top of Git : 5f67888 (as of 20160429.234845 UTC) >> CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/QUAGGA-QPWORK-357/ >> >> Get source and apply patch from patchwork: Successful >> ---------------- >> >> Building Stage: Successful >> ---------------- >> >> Basic Tests: Failed >> ---------------- >> Static analyzer (clang): Successful >> Ipv4 protocols on ubuntu 14.04: Successful >> >> Regards, >> NetDEF/OpenSourceRouting Continous Integration (CI) System >> >> --- >> OpenSourceRouting.org is a project of the Network Device Education >> Foundation, >> For more information, see www.netdef.org and www.opensourcerouting.org >> For questions in regards to this CI System, contact Martin Winter, >> mwin...@netdef.org >> >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
