I think >=2.2.0 is enough for now.
On 03/08/2013 11:42 AM, Akihiro MOTOKI wrote:
Thanks for releasing.
Good point. Why not >=2.2.0,<3.0.0?
Of cource I don't think we have quantumclient 2.9.10 :-)
On launchpad I noticed 2.2.1 milestone is created.
Are there any guidelines for 2.2.1 and 3.0.0?
I think small fixes in 2.0 series should be targeted to 2.2.1 and
others should go to 3.0.0.
thanks,
Akihiro
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:01:51 -0800
From: Dan Wendlandt <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Quantum-core] Quantum Client 2.2.0 release
yeah, good point.
dan
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Mark McClain <[email protected]> wrote:
All-
The 2.2.0 version of the python-quantumclient library is now available in PyPI.
We might want to be proactive and set the upper requirement to be less than 3.0, so that we
don't potentially break the other projects when 3.0.0 is released.
python-quantumclient>=2.2.0,<=2.9.9
Thoughts?
mark
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
