'pip' can act strangely at times with alpha/beta releases if we want to release 3.0.0a in PyPI for wider community testing. My thinking was to go the really safe route with 2.9.9. If the consensus is <3.0.0, I'd be fine with it too.
mark On Mar 7, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Akihiro MOTOKI <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for releasing. > > Good point. Why not >=2.2.0,<3.0.0? > Of cource I don't think we have quantumclient 2.9.10 :-) > > On launchpad I noticed 2.2.1 milestone is created. > Are there any guidelines for 2.2.1 and 3.0.0? > I think small fixes in 2.0 series should be targeted to 2.2.1 and > others should go to 3.0.0. > > thanks, > Akihiro > >>>>>> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:01:51 -0800 >>>>>> From: Dan Wendlandt <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Quantum-core] Quantum Client 2.2.0 release >> >> yeah, good point. >> >> dan >> >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Mark McClain <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> All- >> >> The 2.2.0 version of the python-quantumclient library is now available in >> PyPI. >> >> We might want to be proactive and set the upper requirement to be less >> than 3.0, so that we >> don't potentially break the other projects when 3.0.0 is released. >> >> python-quantumclient>=2.2.0,<=2.9.9 >> >> Thoughts? >> >> mark >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> -- >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> Dan Wendlandt >> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com >> twitter: danwendlandt >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
