Hi Gary, I agree, and had the same thought when doing through and updating the Ubuntu section.
One of my goals in creating the Make Quantum Simpler/Easier session at the design summit (http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/edit/251) is discuss ideas for eliminating the set of configuration options that must be set just to be compatible with the plugin that is chosen. I'm not sure if this should happen at the code-level (similar to the port-binding changes we made) or at the packaging level (e.g., different configuration defaults based on the plugin that is installed). Will be a good thing to discuss. Dan On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Gary Kotton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I have added in support for Fedora: https://review.openstack.org/#** > /c/25986/ <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25986/>. > At the moment the installation section has a number of configuration > details. I think that this is pretty confusing and the fact that we have > more than one distribution makes things pretty confusing. I think that we > should divide it up as follows: > 1. Installations > Ubuntu > Fedora > Other distributions > 2. Configurations > Plugin A > Plugin B > ... > At the moment the configurations are done in the Ubuntu section. This also > lacks a lot of support for a number of the supported plugins. > Thanks > Gary > > > -- > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~**quantum-core<https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core> > Post to : > [email protected].**net<[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~**quantum-core<https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core> > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
