Hi Gary, Indeed zyluo has already pushed a patch that merges oslo db ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27196/), and I have replied with the same concerns as yours (especially around config options). The patch has already been +2 once.
I agree with you anyway that we should push those changes in oslo first. Salvatore On 22 April 2013 11:15, Gary Kotton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I have started to try and integrate the common DB code into Quantum. There > are a number of issues: > 1. OSLO uses the section DEFAULT and we use DATABASE. I am concerned about > a version upgrade. I think that maybe we should try and ensure that OSLO > also supports DATABASE section. What do you guys think? It may help solve > issues with a upgrade. > 2. OSLO uses a sqllite database by default. Due to the fact that all of > our tests access the database means that it takes hours. Should we also > strive to have the default updated in OLSO? > I Hope to maybe be able to push a patch today or tomorrow (terrible jet > lag at the moment) > Thanks > Gary > > -- > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~**quantum-core<https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core> > Post to : > [email protected].**net<[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~**quantum-core<https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core> > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
