On 04/22/2013 11:17 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Salvatore, Gary
Sorry it is too early to +2.
No need to apologize. I do it all the time :). If I have a $ for every
+2 I have given that is followed by a -1 then I'd be a very rich man
I removed my +2
2013/4/22 Salvatore Orlando<[email protected]>:
Hi Gary,
Indeed zyluo has already pushed a patch that merges oslo db
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27196/), and I have replied with the same
concerns as yours (especially around config options).
The patch has already been +2 once.
I agree with you anyway that we should push those changes in oslo first.
Salvatore
On 22 April 2013 11:15, Gary Kotton<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I have started to try and integrate the common DB code into Quantum. There
are a number of issues:
1. OSLO uses the section DEFAULT and we use DATABASE. I am concerned about
a version upgrade. I think that maybe we should try and ensure that OSLO
also supports DATABASE section. What do you guys think? It may help solve
issues with a upgrade.
2. OSLO uses a sqllite database by default. Due to the fact that all of
our tests access the database means that it takes hours. Should we also
strive to have the default updated in OLSO?
I Hope to maybe be able to push a patch today or tomorrow (terrible jet
lag at the moment)
Thanks
Gary
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
