Hi Jon,
I have standard XR2 front and 1100 fiesta rear shocks and springs on 
mine with Toyo R888s and although I've still to try a track day, I have 
driven it VERY hard on the road. The handling is very predictable and 
sure footed. However, when I first got the car it performed very 
similar to the way you describe - when I removed the front struts, 
there was almost no resistance in them at all and the spirings had 
compressed to almost an inch shorter (they weren't lowered ones). The 
suspension change coupled with replacing 10 year old tyres transformed 
the car. It still runs on rubber bushes as well - My point is that we 
all know that the 2+2 can be a really good handling car, so it's not an 
inherent design fault of the model, therfore you need to have a good 
look at everything on your car - nuts, bolts, bushes, springs, dampers, 
etc, etc.



Cheers

Bob Craig



>----Original Message----

>From: [email protected]

>Date: 21/03/2012 23:24 

>To: <[email protected]>

>Subj: Re: [Quantum Owners] Fw: 2+2 handling problem

>

>Well thanks Bobby and Michael, yes it was a case of lift off oversteer 
which in normal cases when driving something like a 205 pug (of which I 
have many track miles experience of) means you just reapply throttle 
till understeer and then lighten said throttle, however the Quantum 
joggles about and does not settle in any direction making it a car that 
requires constant action to guide where you want it, and this time the 
oversteer took over savagely.

>Heavy acceleration would on no account make a FWD car oversteer unless 
something broke!

>I may sound big headed but actually had 2 lap records and a Hill 
record to my name so on no acccount would I heavy brake on a corner 
either.

>I would say it was almost a problem on the road too as my Mondeo 
handles and corners far better.

>Plus adding weight as suggested until the car is dulled down !! is not 
an option.

>I can live with the torque steer from the turbo power happily, its the 
basic feel that is the problem.

>Perhaps the only way is to play with spring rates and get a set of 
adjustable shocks.

>The Quantum is on 5 year old Yoki 309's at 23psi rear and 26 front.

>I think it would benefit from stiffer dampers as the car is fitted 
with near new standard ones.

>I was hoping someone else had been down this path and had solved it or 
is it just my car?

>Cheers

>Jon

>  ----- Original Message ----- 

>  From: [email protected] 

>  To: [email protected] 

>  Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:42 PM

>  Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Fw: 2+2 handling problem

>

>

>  In a message dated 20/03/2012 22:58:17 GMT Standard Time, jon.
[email protected] writes:

>    so I went the 1.4 front and 1100 rear set up which was a whole lot 
better however I am still unhappy with it as its joggly 

>  Maybe the first thing to bear in mind is that the suspension of the 
Fiesta was designed with a view to the car being used with 4 adults on 
board weighing around about 160 lbs with a further 120 lbs in the boot 
by way of luggage plus further weight on a roof rack. Then take into 
account that the body of the Fiesta might be 200 lbs heavier than the 
2+2   If you carried a similar weight in the 2+2 the suspension would 
doubtless joggle less.

>

>  'Front wheel drive cars should understeer'  a reasonable assumption 
and the standard version of the Fiesta probably would but, before you 
set about changing things it might be as well to check through any 
other changes you might have made to the car, as compared with the 
Fiesta on which it was based and also to recall whether there was 
anything unusual about the Goodwood incident. 

>

>   Did the car oversteer because of it's set up or was there any other 
input, heavy braking, or acceleration which might have provoked the 
oversteer.  Having done this you may then have to decide for yourself, 
or factors like tyre pressure that might have altered the cars response 
whether you want a car which is ideal for track days but a pain for 
ordinary motoring or a car which handles well and rides well on 
ordinary roads but needs a bit more care and forethought when being 
driven on a track.

>

>  What you decide to do,or change, is, of course, entirely up to you 
but remember that the development programme that lead to the base model 
being the way it was was the result of many thousands of hours testing 
and may well have involved comparison of hundreds of shock absorbers, 
to name but one component.

>

>  Michael

>

>  -- 

>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.

>  To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

>  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-
[email protected]

>  For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

>   

>  IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an 
"As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the 
Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum 
Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have 
any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, 
or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the 
instructions contained within this or related message(s).

>

>-- 

>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.

>To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-
[email protected]

>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

>

>IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an 
"As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the 
Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum 
Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have 
any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, 
or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the 
instructions contained within this or related message(s).



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).

Reply via email to