On 14 Feb 2008, at 20:48, Jacopo Mangiavacchi wrote:
As I just said I’m not a expert at all here and this was really my first experience with this tool but I found extreme advantages from Quartz Composer. I found it a very high level tool, easier to use then any other traditional development environment and I believe it implements a real visual approach on graphic programming. I really appreciate how it's so easy to reuse graphic components.
I firmly believe QC is a good tool to use for implementing the sort of system you're describing. You may find some elements of it need extra work since there are limits to QC's built-in possibilities, but you would find that with any development environment and ultimately it's about finding the best tool for the job at hand.
We're using QC for *a lot* of very exciting stuff at the company I run. I can't talk about specifics but we've chosen to use it over traditional development environments such as Director and Flash and we're already seeing huge benefits of using it, just weeks into the start of a new project.
In particular, it means that non-technical staff can actually help build final products that are functional, rather than just making mockups that would then need to be passed to coders for building. I firmly believe the separation between coders/graphic designers is false and any tool that helps break that barrier is a powerful one. QC fits the bill nicely!
All the best, Adrian. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
