It sounds like you want to avoid hooking noodles to iterator enable
ports b/c of large quantity of outputs, is that it?
Could you edit the plist in a text editor. I've done that in Keynote
to save time when I need a lot of constructs never in QC though…
If that's an option then maybe an Applescript?
On 09/05/2011, at 5:22 AM, George Toledo wrote:
Is it possible to make an output port evaluate *without* hooking
something to it?
Is it possible to have a kind of implied consumer that "attaches"
itself to every output port with a supposition that all outs get
evaluated by the first layer (or something that poses as the first
layer for that moment), but without actually manually hooking output
ports to a patch?
--
George Toledo
gtole...@gmail.com
www.georgetoledo.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com
)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/qc.student.au%40gmail.com
This email sent to qc.student...@gmail.com
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but
plunges him more deeply into them.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
