Doesn't it just use QC's coordinate system where origin is in the center? ie, if you manually set a Render In Image to be say, a set pixel size, a billboard at 0, 0, with width of 2 will be "640" pixels wide and fill the output image horizontally, and if its set to auto-height, it will fill the image the exact same way the Viewer would be filled by the same billboard settings…
Im 99% sure thats how it works :) On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:40 PM, George Toledo <gtole...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does it make sense that when height is set to less than full raster with a > Render In Image, that pixels are cut from the bottom instead of top? Has it > always been this way? It seems to go against the grain of everything else in > OS X, where origin is 0,0. > > > -gt > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/doktorp%40mac.com > > This email sent to dokt...@mac.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
