Hmm, that must be the case. Fair enough! On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Mailing Lists <li...@vade.info> wrote:
> Doesn't it just use QC's coordinate system where origin is in the center? > > ie, if you manually set a Render In Image to be say, a set pixel size, a > billboard at 0, 0, with width of 2 will be "640" pixels wide and fill the > output image horizontally, and if its set to auto-height, it will fill the > image the exact same way the Viewer would be filled by the same billboard > settings… > > Im 99% sure thats how it works :) > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:40 PM, George Toledo <gtole...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Does it make sense that when height is set to less than full raster with a >> Render In Image, that pixels are cut from the bottom instead of top? Has it >> always been this way? It seems to go against the grain of everything else in >> OS X, where origin is 0,0. >> >> >> -gt >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/doktorp%40mac.com >> >> This email sent to dokt...@mac.com > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
