On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<[email protected]> wrote:
> A `git diff` could be used to avoid this, but still it makes much sense
> to have it always fast-forward.

This does not catch someone rewriting old commit messages to hide
things. AFAIK there is no better way than manually checking each
commit since the common ancestor.

> Being member of the organization does not imply write access to the
> repository. I agree this somehow makes the separate organization
> a bit weird, but those two points above still holds.

Ah, I did not understand that. In that case all seems good :)

> You know, you can push a branch, wait for Travis and only then open PR
> ;)
> This require just signing up to Travis yourself (and enabling it for
> particular repository).

I tried to do that, but (at least at the time) the authorization
scheme used gave them a token enabling write access to the contents of
(all!) your repositories, and I did not want to allow that. Perhaps
this has changed since, idk.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/CABQWM_CD0RpC1LTdYOSSM%2BUOnObrSF7Bu7B9T_vtG7jw5qMRNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to