On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:05AM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not criticizing the choice of salt, I am just curious about why
> exactly it was chosen over the alternatives. From the list archives it
> appears that it was just suddenly being worked on, and I'd be
> interested to know what lead to choosing it instead of
> {ansible,chef,puppet,etc.}. I could not find any public discussion on
> our list archives evaluating their relative merits.
>
> Regards,
> Jean-Philippe
I suspect that, as with Fedora in dom0, it was what the developers were
comfortable with.
There have been discussions about other management stacks, and some
proposed solutions, but I haven't seen many of those since salt was
adapted to Qubes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/20170320000815.GC17309%40thirdeyesecurity.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
