Hi, folks! On your website, there at least two Markdown conventions in contentual conflict.
At [1] in the section "Markdown Conventions", the second point says: > * Hard wrap Markdown lines at 80 characters. At [2] in the section "Markdown Conventions", the second point says: > * Insert a newline at the end of each sentence. > > * Rationale: This practice is most appropriate for source that > consists primarily of natural language text. It results in > the most useful diffs and facilitates translation into other > languages while mostly preserving source readability. As long as there are no special reasons for these contradictory rules, I suggest to resolve that conflict, e.g. by deleting one of those convention lists and link to the other instead. I prefer the latter convention point to keep (since most links point to these [2] conventions and because of the given rationale -especially the translation thing). Why is this important? Well, there are lots of Markdown files with more than one sentence per line or with partial sentences per line. Both result in very ugly phrases to translate at Transifex. :S To be honest, I lose my desire to translate such things. I guess that other translators think alike. Kind regards, Tobias [1] https://github.com/QubesOS/qubesos.github.io/blob/master/README.md [2] https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-doc/blob/master/basics_user/doc-guidelines.md -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/438173d4-f526-5fd6-b6c1-806c50c6ce47%40posteo.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
