>
> As long as that is the case, it's not worth the complexity IMO. Note
> however that the storage subsystem API for R4 has still been designed
> to be compatible with moving storage out of dom0 in the future.
>
In https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1293 @Marek mentions
that it would protect against malicious disk firmware, since this could own
Dom0 via an DMA attack, is Qubes currently still vulnerable against this
type of an attack?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/f59324b0-73d0-422f-8f92-8808dbda47ac%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
