On Friday, 24 November 2017 14:46:47 UTC+8, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
>
> On Friday, 24 November 2017 14:39:26 UTC+8, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
>  
>
>> Use a specific source vm in the first field, not $anyvm, otherwise you 
>> may actually be better off without split-gpg entirely depending on 
>> your threat model.
>
>
> I still get the notification asking me to allow the signing. With the line 
> added, the
> behaviour seems to be identical to what I had in 3.2.
>

I do agree with you in the general case, that locking things are better 
than not
locking them. In this particular case, however, I want almost all my VM's 
to be
able to sign at one point or the other. And this behaviour was deemed 
acceptable
in 3.2, so I don't really see how my solution can be seen as being overly 
bad?

Regards,
Elias

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/240c288e-17bd-4e1d-96fa-38c67c7b701f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to