On 05/26/2016 06:42 PM, Franz wrote:


On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Chris Laprise <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 05/25/2016 05:13 PM, Franz wrote:



        On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

            On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 1:24:04 AM UTC-4, J. Eppler
        wrote:
            > Hello,
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > If there is another web conferencing app that works
        better for
            qubes I would be happy to try it.
            >
            > https://tox.chat/
            > - you will find the clients here:
        https://tox.chat/download.html
            > - I would use qTox or uTox for desktop systems
            >
            > or another one:
            >
            > https://jitsi.org/
            >
            > Best regards
            >   J. Eppler

            Does TOX have video?  if so how is the quality of the
        connection?


        qTox and uTox do have video, but for using them in Qubes we
        have to deal with the usual webcam issues, which means that a
        USB controller should be assigned to a conference VM. I find
        this even more difficult now that the current Xen version does
        not let me to assign one USB controller to  sys-usb and the
        other to a conference-VM anymore, because the two controllers
        share some resources, which is a security issue. So both
        controllers must go assigned to the same VM.

        Otherwise one may think of making a script to hot assign USB
        controllers form sys-usb to conference VM and then back again,
        but I have a feeling that it would not work that way, rather
        need a reboot, then conference, then a reboot again to come
        back to the starting setting, which seems too much for me.

        I also thought of putting an additional USB controller into
        the expresscard slot, bought two of them rated as working with
        linux, but none really worked with my Qubes.

        I reverted to using another non-Qubes computer for
        conferences. But obviously this is a very serious limitation.

        So, writing this  I wonder if it may make sense to use sys-usb
        as a conference VM. Sys-usb is red and should be considered
        compromised, but it may be better to have a compromised
        conference than nothing. Certainly my sys-usb is much more
        secure than the other non-Qubes computer that I am using now.
        What do you think?

        Best
        Fran


    Mixing usb isolation with the network? I would avoid that if possible.


Why? what may happen in your view? It is only some encrypted conference software that uses the network to communicate with people you trust.


A usb webcam could attack the host vm used for conferencing, stealing the keys or contents of the streams and sending them to an eavesdropper. It could also receive updates to its own malware, and maybe even find some wireless mice and keyboards to infect.

Best to keep USB and network completely separate.

Chris

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/574783F4.6080102%40openmailbox.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to