On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 1:30:46 AM UTC+2, Unman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:39:00AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:42PM +0100, Unman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:33:47PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote:
> > > > > Am 10.06.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Unman:
> > > > > 
> > > > > >> Has anybody had success getting a Ubuntu template compiled? Even 
> > > > > >> at 16.04?
> > > > > > If you mean "at all", then some months back I built a 14.04. Haven't
> > > > > > tried anything more recent.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Right now I'm not able to even compile it even after getting a fresh
> > > > > building environment... I guess I'll have to get some more exercise,
> > > > > then, unless someone is generating a working setup.
> > > > 
> > > > I think currently builder-debian support at most vivid. But it shouldn't
> > > > be hard to add anything newer.
> > > 
> > > It isn't.
> > > Last night I built Xenial - I'll put in a PR today, 

Has this happened? I'd like to build a 16.04 template, but the Qubes Builder in 
the offical QubesOS repository does not offer Xenial - neither does the one in 
Mareks repository...

Regards, Frank

> > 
> > How have you solved problem with /etc/xdg/Trolltech.conf conflict?
> 
> Put the Qubes one in ~/.config and in skel.
> I think that should work ok generally, except for switching VM to xenial
> template. Then it's just ordinary Trolltech.conf troubles.
> 
> > 
> > > although there's
> > > some stuff that needs tidying up - why don't the versions share the same
> > > keyring? 
> > 
> > If Canonical decide to to change the key, to be able to support that.
> > But if the keyring is the same for now, it can be symlinked.
> > 
> > > Why identical package lists? 
> > 
> > Actually, for Xenial you'll probably need slightly different package
> > list, as there is no linux-firmware-nonfree package anymore.
> 
> Yes, but most of the others are just copies
> 
> > But if it turns out to be the same, it can be symlinked. The same
> > applies to appmenus.
> > 
> > > Looks like a fair bit of
> > > duplication for reasons that escape me.
> > > 
> > > Also, is there a need to retain the old versions? My preference would be
> > > to just have LTS. Thoughts on this?
> > 
> > Yes, good idea. Or maybe two of them - latest LTS and latest release in
> > general.
> 
> I'll clean this up if that's ok.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best Regards,
> > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> > Invisible Things Lab
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/492d63bf-81fa-429e-b7ef-2b2e865a3598%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to