TheFactory:
> Another good use for this feature is that you can pre-program in some 
> landmines to destroy the drive and overcome brute force. Since the LUKS 
> password prompt on my install of 3.2 has little to no delay between password 
> attempts one could use a mid range gpu to try millions of passwords. The 
> drive itself can be copied dozens of times to increase the chances of getting 
> the password.
> 
> However if
> 
> If you had a limit of 10 or 20 tries before drive wipe.
> 
> And had a dozen or more fake passwords that would induce drive wipe.
> 
> And had some sort of delay in each password attempt built in.(veracrypt takes 
> forever to process your password input for instance)
> 
> Using tpm ontop of this would also at least frustrate their attempts at 
> mirroring the drive.
> 
> You could be reasonably certian that even powerful attempts at getting the 
> drive open will be hopeless. Though, you may get yourself in some physical 
> trouble.
> 
> I have wanted features like the above ones for some time.
> 

The problem with the "landmines" idea is that it requires the computer
to react to the passphrase and begin wiping the drive.  In an offline
brute-force scenario, one assumes the adversary has a disk image, and
they're surely going to remove any "landmine wipe" feature from their
version of cryptsetup.

A setup requiring a key *both* in your TPM and derived from a passphrase
would really be ideal, though, yes.  A PCR-constrained TPM outer key
makes brute force impractical without physically attacking the TPM.  At
the same time, you don't rely solely on your TPM's security.

Andrew

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/3200bb45-482a-9ed1-a4d8-95c09a7bb990%40riseup.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to