-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-07-24 16:22, Andrew David Wong wrote: > But if anyone has a better solution, I'm all ears. >
I appreciate all the alternative suggestions. It's always nice to have multiple options for achieving the same effect, but I'm struggling to see why I should switch from my current method (which seems to work fine for me) to one of the other proposed methods (which seem more complicated to me). It's quite possible I'm missing something. So, which of these many methods is better (more secure, more reliable, etc.), and why? - -- Andrew David Wong (Axon) Community Manager, Qubes OS https://www.qubes-os.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXm4/vAAoJENtN07w5UDAwrj4P/0xjZ26jr9eWtQRG9tpRpcfx ctqIeowBENekv/jubdgOzZcLL1alUoRky1r1xUXF4bZk9V3DePS/W0NKrEQzc/Ip IFRfQUy1+eoDxrJkYkz++es1SiIy/jWR9MkqkUcDbxWQDHQKX5LQk/6aiQG7fHvT 8eER5KYDOxAbuVl6sWQrgf6SG5feOGmKP1jznwfzrT3KhCFlJB79kikh2S0SoaIZ jAgwOpJf6x/hpcjISSKLAQ/hDJyBw8qj6A9siwEoIILx+j9bFT0bK1kqz3b8npYP OaaOzuWHbVFgPsCJkai6j/wKXIeGEM4caFrGpCssLJFDLadABkKFpcpKv561Xt5m G7p5BD6RFXiPi9rgnuqBI9qLSS4MJfn+ES4l2GJdB1hCnd+o9N0XugZouc1fEEXk Qx3qOd0VsBpgUDCHfl+juAYh6yNUCrF8RubvcltGZVy8oW0aE/0utXlbnkkle8SA hdziRvpdBlr20kVyhZbZiUlgyaEkBBsbXPfsfQNnIOzwt8nuNEUmcFQQeHuwO2TF lYMPgyJhAfVhJjuUYjDZMwYEVBTtnCVEtH47c4rdRCvCzOCMQoixg1NWxQPx9ntc yDtV2Jh7wPlvKWtRh6DsNFBGrvUI/LXjRwlgLwlGrct5BJt33/We9Sdr1iZVrRZS CrC0SrbQbbBQJ55KKxoT =dOfF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/87fe6126-0856-c1f2-890b-b16892e513b8%40qubes-os.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
