I have seen much more systemd hates than proper arguments against systemd. But if systemd is really wrong, this kind of debate does not contribute for rejecting it.
>From security perspective in context of dom0, systemd is a process that >interacts with local processes and maybe with few other local things. If >systemd is really wrong for security (I am not convinced so), I would expect >it to allow local privilege escalation, which is not much a threat in context >of Qubes. Did you mean something else? If there is a proper argument against systemd for dom0, I hope Qubes developers will hear it. But they will hardly move to Slackware (or another non-systemd distro) just for sake of getting rid of systemd. I guess that without a good argument for it*, there will be always something more important giving better improvement, requiring less effort and indroducing less risks. Regards, Vít Šesták 'v6ak' *) I am not stating there is not any reasonable argument. There might be one I haven't realized. But if there is any, it should be mentioned in a proper way. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/bf23e910-11d1-443b-b6f4-b9e89ac24674%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.