-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 2017-03-17 14:10, Unman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:49:04AM -0700, cooloutac wrote: >> On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 1:48:27 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote: >>> On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 1:17:10 PM UTC-4, Unman wrote: >>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 04:38:17PM +0000, faber wrote: >>>>> I have a Debian-9 StandaloneVM that I recently am unable to start it. >>>>> The only thing I've done, before getting stuck there, was removing >>>>> libreoffice (all packages), jack, mutt and icedove, nothing special. >>>>> >>>>> logs from /var/log/xen/console/guest-dev.log: >>>>> >>>>> https://share.riseup.net/#jt9PHXk7pbpDkz0ZKmwy7g >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you need anything else, please let me know! >>>> >>>> If you start it using qvm-start what error do you see? >>>> Once you have started it can you attah to the console from dom0 using >>>> (as root) xl console <name> ? >>> >>> ya and if you can do that check apt log. I kill my debian system all the >>> time removing or installing packages. I blindly click yes and don't >>> realize its asking me if it can kill my system by removing desktop haha. >>> >>> after reading about how when updating a template you could accidentally >>> click yes to a not verified key I had to tell my family to make sure they >>> read for that specific thing especially before hitting y. (this has nothing >>> to do with your issue sorry) >> >> and when that happens you just keep trying till it gets a valid key. >> > > I hope this was a joke. > I have no sense of humour - do NOT do this. > It's a common situation and you will find many answers with a simple > search. >
I'm unclear about the disagreement here. I understood cooloutac as saying: Sometimes, apt-get may download a package with an invalid signature. In that case, you should not install the invalidly signed package. Instead, you should re-download the package (and let apt-get re-check the signature), e.g., after a period of time, from a different server, or via a different connection, until you get a validly signed package, and only then proceed with installing that package. If that's what cooloutac meant, then I'm not sure I see the problem with that approach. Isn't that what we *should* do in that situation? P.S. - Let's keep the discussion civil and productive, please. - -- Andrew David Wong (Axon) Community Manager, Qubes OS https://www.qubes-os.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYzcRHAAoJENtN07w5UDAwv38P/idMKPQlh+1hqJmlPwQJJHVq TjXSUJnS3AL2kX9WGmAbID1cPl3SxHG8ElDWbU5CxnJ7CdgffIV4CRqBcxo/z75H 6ggMHBKQuZXTUzKTU8IObHwy2A2wTo6RYNYsVO93GFiPsRGQnrXOYxcQ2jFhvZsM Hsih4Eg60Rbv/pbagWcooVfKDhMrqMHR+tnBBJzcXEwwgqVl2vhCcvzeL/ZeYfAN Z1nCenv42AQ601hKIDkD8+CgbXzCxAPtQQ7vXHAYq9W8UL/nWRzSbT3L5ih2Z7JW NUoNJ3NmMXPj11uf7EnZb+NY1mA70njdCQ0HdxiXB6iAZVQ8fJ0Fz6juyFie6RyP murVctv1Btgz6FR5clKfS9tIFxZJ2bTtPtFNTeiOZInDqIyJLr662Ji/i8Qql6b2 aTfk0PxSWiDhXeyyBy6NuCckDRvUWyb0FNXJBLNUTzNR8zAuAuR+/jnwTdT+Q/YY v9Ja6LoqH3s7nfluxi4Zm4TInd/I7XkehYdikm+O4D9re4haoPJkYGfiMzc+g6qH vDMbGWttj7Tc0wQbmItbb31Nr1/R13wAfST9XMXQS0pav9zOS6J3yOy0Lu8aiQyU vcB2lP2cQon5capDrP8fatb4mEpRORdBwJ5tv+N2Tqq3tshzxaxJ6AhgzPDHUJmu punfqhmLEuvp2TodREZT =xrUX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/79d67fad-7d94-dd2e-0a38-7df99697717e%40qubes-os.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
