On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 6:20:35 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
> On 04/04/2017 10:19 AM, cooloutac wrote:
> 
> >
> > The hacking teams insyde bios exploit could only have been stopped with 
> > secure boot.
> >
> Uhh no that isn't true, and again you're using microsoft's marketing 
> name for something that is a generic technology (signing of kernel and 
> important files) implemented in grub etc.
> 
> On my libre coreboot system (not all coreboot is libre) I can use a 
> signing key mechanism to sign kernels and load them with grub installed 
> on my motherboards write-locked flash chip.
> 
> 
> Do you work for microsoft?

Microsoft didn't create secure boot,  intel did. They just tried to monopolize 
it and failed.   Tell all the major linux distros that they work for Microsoft 
lol...

I see you are Libre guy, that explains alot,   but why ignore my comment about 
what Richard Stallman says about "secure boot"?  DOES Richard Stallman work for 
windows!?!?    haha...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/0a50e594-4d43-4807-94a2-e517dd83b4bb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to