On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 23:34:21 UTC+11, Tom Zander wrote: > On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 13:02:43 CET Franz wrote: > > Sorry for the obviously stupid question, but why is it harder to write it > > in python rather than something else? > > Not at all, its a good question. > > It is harder to *have* to write it in python instead of any langauge any > developer may be actually good at. > > It limits the pool of available developers, available toolkits/libraries and > other such resources quite dramatically. > -- > Tom Zander > Blog: https://zander.github.io > Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
Python is bloated and slow. I wrote my own manager for 3.2 and it does more than what theirs did, and it does it cleaner and more efficiently with much less RAM and CPU utilisation. They never fixed the issues I told them about in the Manager for 3.2. They updated it and made it worse. The things I recommended be fixed, they didn't do it right even when they tried to fix it. But I think that that may have been a limitation of Python rather than them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/0767e68a-d0b0-49a6-9b81-e2e125fba67f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.