On Sat, December 16, 2017 2:25 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > Aight, so the idea of this thread, is to get an overview of where we > stand, that is, how far are we away from archiving GPU Passthrough on > Qubes.
If you look at how the "competition" is approaching it, you need GPU hardware capable of virtualization such as Nvidia Grid, Radeon Sky(?), Intel GVT-g and hypervisor support. https://www.nvidia.com/object/grid-technology.html https://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/sky https://01.org/igvt-g https://code.vmware.com/article-detail/-/asset_publisher/8n011DnrSCHt/content/vsga-datasheet https://docs.citrix.com/content/dam/docs/en-us/xenserver/xenserver-7-0/downloads/xenserver-7-0-configuring-graphics.pdf Not something I've ever played with, but it seems kind of like IOMMU to me. You could write a software layer to provide slow virtualized GPUs, or use hardware for faster ones. Of these, it seems like Intel's approach is the most open source friendly. XenGT has working code. No idea how hard it would be to integrate with Qubes, though. > I must be tired, I initially wrote 'qubestions' instead of 'questions' > here... aight, so possible questions for the discussion. I like it! Let's rename the FAQ to Frequently Asked Qubestions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/61a84e9c7dc6a5d9303fdd39f3c25ca9.squirrel%40tt3j2x4k5ycaa5zt.onion. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
