On Sunday, 17 December 2017 11:59:26 CET Yuraeitha wrote: > f, but from what I understand, complex software is hard to make secure, > compared to well-made hardware minimizing use of software. If Qubes > hypothetically were to adopt these, would the hardware approach be more > secure here?
The question isn't really about software vs hardware. The overall design and concept is what is more important. The actual approach of how to do this makes or breaks the security mode. >From that approach follows what parts are required to be in hardware (to still be fast and secure). I claim no expertise in the domain you address in this thread, so apologies for the generic answer. -- Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1828191.tAHdXYOLUq%40cherry. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
