On 12/19/18 6:39 PM, Andrew David Wong wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/19/18 4:34 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi, I updated the dom0 and after I tried to update the Fed-28 template. I get 
following error:

[user@fedora-28 ~]$ sudo dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:27:37 ago on Wed 19 Dec 2018 11:04:23 AM CET.
Dependencies resolved.

Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 4: package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64 requires 
hplip-common(x86-64) = 3.18.6-10.fc28, but none of the providers can be 
installed
   - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and 
hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
================================================================================
Package              Arch          Version                Repository      Size
================================================================================
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
hplip-common         x86_64        3.18.6-11.fc28         updates        110 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
hplip                x86_64        3.18.6-11.fc28         updates         16 M
hplip-libs           x86_64        3.18.6-11.fc28         updates        204 k
libsane-hpaio        x86_64        3.18.6-11.fc28         updates        127 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Skip  4 Packages

Nothing to do.
Complete!

*******************************

When doing the --best --allowerasing I get this:

[user@fedora-28 ~]$ sudo dnf --best --allowerasing update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:55 ago on Wed 19 Dec 2018 11:04:23 AM CET.
Error:
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - problem with installed package libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - problem with installed package hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64

*********************************

Any help appreciated.
Thank you!


It's an upstream Fedora issue. For more info, see:

https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4629

Yes, this is an upstream problem, which has been fixed in the "updates-testing" repo. I got bitten by this one in that hplip got removed, so I was unable to print anything, so I was forced to investigate.

The temporary fix here should be to enable the "updates-testing" repo and reinstall the packages ntop hplip net-snmp-libs to force the correct dependancies to be evaluated.

Since my installation was missing hplip I had to install, rather than reinstall, but that set of commands should look something like this:

$ sudo dnf clean all
$ sudo dnf reinstall --allowerasing --enablerepo=updates-testing hplip net-snmp-libs
$ sudo dnf clean all
$ sudo dnf update

You may see ntop being removed as a dependent package, in which case you may need to reinstall it after the above is completed if you use it. Hopefully those two packages from testing were not full of bugs. I'll be testing that this afternoon after some meetings.

Steve.





- -- Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4aEi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/2fd547ed-27c0-73b0-bb0d-7bc8ac56419d%40jhuapl.edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to