Alexandre Belgrand wrote on 1/29/19 8:13 AM:
Le mardi 29 janvier 2019 à 09:51 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen a écrit :
Yeah yeah, the only modification was that chip as claimed in the
Magically all the necessary signal pins were routed to its location
but nothing else was changed (and you cannot have that many pins in
that sized chip anyway which will seriously limit the possible
and processing speed). ...But it must all be true and present in
of servers because a sensational article so claims (funny though that
so claimed victims of the attack consistently denied presence of such
chip in their servers but I guess you'll anyway think they must be
for the benefit of the Chinese, damage control, because of the
"investigation", or whatever reason).
Good point. Obviously, this article has had access to classified
informations and is part of a new "name and shame" policy. So can we
No. That Bloomberg article is a good example of FUD. Simplest
explanation is it's sown by someone looking to make a quick buck by
shorting Supermicro stock. Slightly more paranoid is it's coming
verbatim from Chinese intelligence services to introduce distrust into
supply lines, similar to what CIA did with Russian pipelines decades
ago. More paranoid is it's from domestic intelligence services seeking
to increase their own obscene budgets by offering to protect us from
these scary threats. In conclusion, it should be ignored until there is
independent confirmation from multiple sources.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.