Hi,
Yes, so I go a bit further. I was actually looking for /dev/xvdi in
the work vm, but it never appeared. I had seen /dev/sda, but having run
qvm-block in DOM0, I was really looking for the /dev/xvdi as the device in
the work vm. Anyway, once I realised I was looking for /dev/sda1 then it
was all easy(your prompting of check dmesg worked). Networking was still
an issue, so I managed to find and old asus USB-N13 usb network adapter,
which was recognised by the kernel. So, suddenly I was working. Next I
thought I would update the kernel to the llatest. I got 5.4.16? Well, I
am not really sure, now, as when I reboot it just will not log me in. Just
reboots every time I login. It was working fire with the stable kernel,
just not latest.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I knew I was doing something
totally silly. Any ideas on how to revert to the old kernel so I can
recover would be appreciated.
Sc0tt....
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 12:27, Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Scott Russell wrote:
>
> > HI, So, since I have no networking, I decided to install the
> networking
> > via a usb pen drive. However, I seem unable to mount the usb drives in
> any
> > vm, tried the fedora-29 template, and also the work vm, or sys-firewall.
> > But each time I click the icon to attach, it reports successfully
> attached,
> > but when I go to the vm, it does not show up. I can see from qvm-block
> that
> > is is attached from dom0, also tried manually attaching via command line,
> > but again, it reports attached, but cannot see in the work vm that it is
> > thre. but when I do a "df -h" or try to list the devices in /dev/xvdi,
> it
> > is not there on the work vm. It seems like a pretty simple thing to
> > attach the pendrive. I have tried several pen drives, but seem unable to
> > mount them in any vm. Have re-read the docs several times, and no-one
> seems
> > to have this issue, so I am probably doing something fundamentally
> wrong?
> > Any advice or hints greatly appreciated?.
>
> I have some problem in understanding what exactly you're doing here as
> your description seems to mix "attaching" and "mounting". In addition
> to attaching the block device, you may have to mount the block device
> mount /dev/xvdi /home/user/somepath
> as a separate step to get it to appear under /home/user/somepath (and df
> will only show mounted drives).
>
> Or did you try to say there's no /dev/xvdi device? ...In that case, check
> the dmesg if the device is detected by the kernel.
>
> --
> i.
>
>
> > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:14, Ilpo Järvinen <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, Scott Russell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, I am installing qubes to an X1 gen2 extreme. Gone well
> > so far, but
> > > then I stumbled into a problem with wifi. Unfortunately the
> > intel ax200 is
> > > not supported in linux kernel till after kernel5-1+. (
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000005511/
> > networ
> > > k-and-i-o/wireless-networking.html).
> >
> > I didn't get AX 200 to work myself and I just use a stop-gap USB
> > WLAN
> > dongle solution currently. I tried with latest kernels, various
> > firmware
> > versions, and even went to dkms backport of iwlwifi but none of
> > those
> > worked.
> >
> > It just seems the iwlwifi driver, despite claims of AX 200 being
> > supported
> > since 5.1, may not work for all (some have gotten it to work but
> > I'm not
> > sure if anyone among them with Qubes).
> >
> > > So, I was wondering on what my options would be. My first
> > thought having
> > > reviewed a few posts, was that I would need to compile the
> > latest kernel and
> > > use this in the sys-net.
> > > Then, I thought, maybe there is already a "latest kernel"
> > somewhere that I
> > > could just install without the need for compiling a new one.
> >
> > Yes, kernel-latest package is already available using
> > qubes-dom0-update.
> > Certainly worth a test.
> >
> > > As an aside, does this mean I should change the underlying
> > template for
> > > sys-net and logically the sys-firewall, or should I keep the
> > sys-net as a
> > > custom kernel version only. If there are other ways, any
> > advice is
> > > appreciated. A lot to learn here, but happy to work through
> > any
> > > suggestions.
> >
> > Kernel version, when provided from dom0, is independent of the
> > template.
> > It is possible to use the kernel from the template if you set
> > "kernel"
> > of the VM to empty (for HVMs).
> >
> > > So, the question is ,can I upgrade the kernel from 4.4.x to
> > 5.1+ in an easy
> > > and safe way, or am I driven to playing with the
> > kernel compilation?
> >
> >
> > --
> > i.
> >
> >
> >
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/CAAvfSaKs-LBk8cDG62uvOenKD%2Bggdz6Mu17wvavF-GvnL6-L4A%40mail.gmail.com.
