S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Per Hedeland wrote:
I.e. if the address in question *is* bound to a socket, the bug will
not occur - and the OP claimed that ntpd *did* have all the IP
addresses bound (but I suspect he may be mistaken).
You are correct. I misunderstood you. I thought you meant that each
address is not listed more than once. In fact, the secondary IPs was not
listed at all. Giving -L to the ntpd indeed make it listen to all IPs.
So indeed it may work with my original setup?
Is there any cost associated on listening to secondary / virtual IPs?
What version of ntp are you running. That's not the way the sources are
coded today. And for that matter where did you get it?
Danny
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
